tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.comments2023-10-12T07:09:45.450-07:00Douginthehouse. Douglashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11869222943805655924noreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-42779528783204112152019-12-26T12:33:49.081-08:002019-12-26T12:33:49.081-08:00شركة تنظيف بالقطيف
شركة تنظيف بالجبيل
شركة كشف ت...<a href="https://light-elrahman.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9-%d8%aa%d9%86%d8%b8%d9%8a%d9%81-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%b7%d9%8a%d9%81/" rel="nofollow">شركة تنظيف بالقطيف </a><br /><a href="https://light-elrahman.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9-%d8%aa%d9%86%d8%b8%d9%8a%d9%81-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d8%a8%d9%8a%d9%84/" rel="nofollow">شركة تنظيف بالجبيل </a><br /><a href="https://light-elrahman.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9-%d9%83%d8%b4%d9%81-%d8%aa%d8%b3%d8%b1%d8%a8%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%87-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ac%d8%a8%d9%8a%d9%84/" rel="nofollow">شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالجبيل </a><br /><a href="https://light-elrahman.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9-%d8%aa%d8%b1%d9%83%d9%8a%d8%a8-%d8%b7%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%af-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ad%d9%85%d8%a7%d9%85-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%af%d9%85%d8%a7%d9%85/" rel="nofollow">شركة تركيب طارد الحمام بالدمام </a><br /><a href="https://light-elrahman.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9-%d9%86%d9%81%d8%ae-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d8%ac%d8%a7%d8%b1%d9%8a-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%82%d8%b5%d9%8a%d9%85/" rel="nofollow">شركة نفخ المجاري بالقصيم </a><br /><a href="https://light-elrahman.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8شركة مكة المملكةhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03019459741085564355noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-33106968237558644812017-09-10T20:36:52.928-07:002017-09-10T20:36:52.928-07:00탑승자를 피하지 못해 발생했다 고속도로 전체 사망자 명의 에 달한다 한국도로공사는 고... 탑승자를 피하지 못해 발생했다 고속도로 전체 사망자 명의 에 달한다 한국도로공사는 고속도로 차 사고를 줄이기 위한 예방책을 추진한다고 일 밝혔다 트렁크를 … sn...안전 놀이터...ow 펜스 부통령은 “한미 가 발효된 이… ...dr...미국주식거래93 포털사이트 실시간 검색어 상위권에 자리하며 화제를 이어갔다 한영은 다리길이 눈에 띄… [프리미엄뷰]아름다운 디자인에 숨겨진 안정성과 내구성 佛 루이뷔통 아르노 회장 디오르 지<br /><br /><a href="http://wan0014.cashmk.com" rel="nofollow">농구 라이브 스코어 </a><br /><a href="http://wan0085.cashmk.com" rel="nofollow">안전 놀이터</a><br /><a href="http://wan0032.cashmk.com" rel="nofollow">카지노사이트</a><br /><a href="http://wan0052.cashmk.com" rel="nofollow">띵동 라이브 스코어</a><br /><a href="http://wan0008.cashmk.com" rel="nofollow">레이싱모델 이예빈 </a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00661456828889506157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-85416144418269745192015-03-25T12:19:47.784-07:002015-03-25T12:19:47.784-07:005.) "So the #1 record is worth X number of po...5.) <i>"So the #1 record is worth X number of points if you are a large station and is worth Y if you are a small station."</i><br /><br />This is why, as a lowly #2, promoters only seem to care about ADDS. Don't know how many times I've had a promoter ask me about a title, if it's spinning, and had to direct them to the chart email I already sent showing said title charted OR was #1 at our station. It's embarrassing as an MD to put so much time and effort into programming, running rotations, supporting records you believe in, keeping material fresh, making sure people have a chance to see your data, etc.., only to turn around and get hounded on the next round of ADDS.<br /><br />Drop the artifice, when a promoter is looking for a max chart potential title - then want frequency, frequency, frequency. They need to work the cores hard for rank and just get frequency out of the rest. I understand why they need to do what they do. You can't blame the promoter, they need to work this system the best they can. The saddest part is so many good records, worked at the 'mid-level' of rosters, not chart priorities, championed by 1's, 2's, and 3's are simply not even acknowledged. If you weren't paying attention lately, only Dan Deacon, Jose Gonzalez, and Father John Misty are the titles you <i>should</i> be paying attention to at CR...<br /><br />6.) <i>"https://collegeradiocharts.wordpress.com/ is one but they give you no information as to how many people reported or their methodology as well."</i><br /><br />>>They used to have contributor numbers per chart, but not anymore. Not sure why. They do have unweighted charts. Even in smaller samples, I look at those to get an idea of what everyone is playing over minority # of MD's (in the CORES) that have the greatest pull in determining the top 10 on CMJ.<br /><br />7.) <i>"http://spinitron.com/charts/ also has a chart that is smaller on scale but also gives you spin counts."</i><br /><br />>>Could Spinitron be the future for specialty Non-Comm and College Radio reporting stations?al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-38436077951006267372015-03-25T12:19:21.190-07:002015-03-25T12:19:21.190-07:00Thoughts:
1.) So, you asked CMJ specifically abou...Thoughts:<br /><br />1.) So, you asked CMJ specifically about a 'bible', a 'key', a 'F.A.Q.' - and the answer you received is that it wasn't really necessary and you could just email them anytime if you have any questions. This seems to be typical.<br /><br />2.) <i>"It is pretty much open to any radio station, be it internet, carrier current, AM/ FM that pays the yearly subscription fee."</i><br /><br />>> Isn't this the COLLEGE MUSIC JOURNAL? There should be reasonable barriers to entry as a valid reporting station. A reasonable quality control measure. Or, do they just want to take subscription money from whoever wants to pay?<br /><br />3.) <i>"There is no real wrong way to do it, there are preferred ways to do it but not wrong."</i><br /><br />>>Subjective statement? Yes. Fair statement? Yes. This reporting system simply does not address them in any way. If artists, labels, promoters, etc... want better data, then we need to start thinking of better data solutions.<br /><br />4.) <i>"When you are a member of CMJ you are given a weight/ ranking. Any station that wants to know their ranking I believe can email the above email and ask. These change from time to time based upon many different factors such as market size and wattage."</i><br /><br />>>Personal experience: Rank is a major determinate of station reach (or potential reach). This means market. Signal strength runs parallel to this, but you could be a 100 watt station running in downtown Boston and a 4000 watt running in Peoria, IL and the former is ranked higher. So, location, location, location > "many different factors" here. If you happen to be in a bad location or without a 100 mile signal, what might you do to improve your ranking over time? That's a great question. I asked twice and didn't get a response. It certainly has nothing to do with reporting, quality of reporting, or your station's actual programming to the format(s) the promoters working CMJ are working.al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-42303427519283272452015-03-04T11:30:40.904-08:002015-03-04T11:30:40.904-08:00AND
Do away with ADDS charts. Makes promoters si...AND<br /><br />Do away with ADDS charts. Makes promoters silly, emphasizes bad data, bad MD's habits, and leads to rash programming decisions. In some cases, if not completely made up to appease distros pushing MD's already over their heads = ["Hey, you haven't given <b>ME</b> an ADD in weeks. <b>Why!?</b>"]<br /><br />Ultimately, the question to ask is what would affect CMJ's 'product'? Some random station charting 'Goldfinger' or adding a title off adds-date three weeks left will not affect the data at the top. The data that CMJ reports in the issues. A station charting Sharon Jones to 'HIP-HOP' will not stem the tide of putting 'Sleater-Kinney' onto the exalted "COVER". Father John Misty is much sexier to highlight on March 4th than, say, 'The Decemberists'. Putting <i>Purity Ring: Eternally Added</i> on the this week's cover is much sexier than 'Matthew E. White' who has much less visibility, reach, and current name-recognition.<br /><br />Re: CMJ. What sells a viable product? More importantly, what sells the influence of the CMJ Marathon? If you know those answers, then you'll understand the motivations (or lack thereof). At best, beyond subscriptions, the charts/issues and publishing of them are loss-leaders to a different business model and monetization path - i.e. their continuation on being the <i>SXSW of NYC</i> during the Fall and selling passes. Larger changes will have to occur in the marketplace in order for CMJ to digress from its own current ways of operation. So, expect nothing to change on the charting front until other external forces (or bankruptcy) prompt it.<br /><br />Ultimately, it's not about breaking or championing 'new' artists anymore as a 'system', as a 'community'. It's not really about College Radio as a viable and recognized media platform. The more we remove ourselves from the core mission(s) and vision(s) of what College Radio is on a base programming level, the more it will continue to erode. It will further fall into a quantity over quality model for the distros. and a national reporting entity that aggregates the data they want at will that matches up to a 'brand' with no real progress towards good communication, community, and support for the stations it charges monies for the mere privilege to participate in. <br /><br />And yes, I'll agree with Doug, stop charging 'Goldfinger'. That is all.al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-50061213121389672122015-03-04T11:30:07.019-08:002015-03-04T11:30:07.019-08:00"While the Decemberists had another great wee..."While the Decemberists had another great week of #1's and improved core, Father John Misty also had a great week with #1's and had slightly more Core under its belt."<br /><br />>>If anything is to prove that the only stations that truly <i>matter</i> are CORES, then look at Recap for issue #1381. The current status of College Radio, next to modern media conglomeration for radio airplay elsewhere, is antithetical to this concept. We are not Billboard, we are not FMQB. The metrics that make a CORE, minus ERP, are subjective. The work is done on the ground, in aggregate. Every station pays the same to report, but are not seen equivalent. It's a have and have-not caste system. There is no recourse with limited resources without external monitoring systems. We have not reached progress - we have reached a system where very few are truly counted. Some university in select academic departments some twenty years ago put resources into their radio station. Now they determine the charts. Again, apologies to 'The Decemberists'.<br /><br />"Is it that the older records are bigger names, or that the companies pushing them don't want to let go? "<br /><br />>>A little of the former, more that (most) records will take longer to gestate into the hearts and minds of persons having to consolidate and curate a massive amount of media content. Forget your standard issue college DJ who doesn't follow this media as general consumption. Many variables at play, but music is still consumed and shared by some form of organic means - alternate media, word of mouth, etc.. The myopic CMJ programmer concept that 'x' artist's ADDS on 'y' issue strongly points to a #1 shot by 'z' issue is played out so many times, which leads me to examples Doug mentions...<br /><br />"Is Jose Gonzalez a contender? Last weeks #1 most added Dan Deacon could see itself in the FJM role and shoot past Jose for a clearer shot at #1. "<br /><br />>>No, and no. Neither Gonzalez or the new Deacon have any shot at #1. Here is where too much stock put into ADDS charts. They are merely one point of data and reference at a finite time in any reporting cycle. Either of those two titles will have to hit on something <i>outside</i> of CR within popular culture: i.e. a crossover hit to other media, platforms, and/or other factors (i.e. PR, marketing 'spread', commercialized sound). These records themselves don't hold up to deep programming options or name recognition outside of the format. This is neither a good or bad thing, as these artists might be true crossover artists of the future. Purity Ring will be your next #1 in 2-3 issues. A great example of an artist with monied interests behind it, some established fan-base, and a LOT of faux hype surrounding a pretty stale act. It's all in the game, and you will get a couple "Purity Rings" per year always.<br /><br />"Should we be asking for a CORE chart to return, should we look at which stations are CORE or not, should we be looking at some new chart that we haven’t even thought of yet (some new genre, or a specific chart just for non-CORE stations to see what’s bubbling under at the 100s of smaller stations out there)? What would you change?"<br /><br />>>Unweighted charts. All CMJ reporting stations equal. Simple frequency/rank metrics for chart position. All charts open for reporting. More robust data management on CMJ's side: i.e. title metrics (dates, issues, expirations, valid specialty charts). All other data goes into a recurrent or 'legacy'. CMJ already auto compiles the data for their AAA "chart" based on select station's 200 submissions - so, they can easily auto-compile this. 95% of issues resolved...al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-61587943023994108692013-06-07T02:36:21.644-07:002013-06-07T02:36:21.644-07:004.) Transparency: If #3 cannot be accomplished, th...4.) Transparency: If #3 cannot be accomplished, then CMJ's published chart is not externally valid. The process should be transparent as a media reporting business entity. There should be no 'grey area' as the entire set of data (all reports) are published each week. The final charts should be able to be independently verified by anyone with the time, skill-set and data outline. The process should be the same for all charts (RPM, Loud Rock, Jazz, etc..) with smaller contributing bases. Results should be replicated with 100% accuracy each and every time. If you are pulling your hair out on why Phoenix was #1 on Top 200 for issue #1297 and the raw data doesn't support that conclusion, ask for clarification on the matter. <br /><br />5.) Repeat experiment - #1300: Take the top 3 records set to chart for issue #1300 [The 'Graceland' Tribunal, The Sad-Sack O'shit Indie Hour, and The Roboto Mask Band] - add the two titles most likely to disrupt position #3 (but not really) - Mikal Cronin and ??. Every chart is equal (cannot stress this enough) Yes, every station matters. Thirty-Point scale: #1 = 30pts; #30 = 1 pt. Start adding. Value added scale based on intervals (no ratios).<br /><br />This method neither proves or disproves any theory based on the rest of the chart (since a very small pre-selected sample is being studied). However, it should tell you clearly what record performed better over the another regardless. Maybe another way of looking at it (not real-world) would be to think of these values as 'spins'. In theory, a title that gets the most airplay (spins) gets number #1 through a combination of occurrence (percentage of stations reporting airplay of title) AND the number of spins it gets (it's position at its station).<br /><br />If the system cannot be observed in a way that can be stripped down to its simplest set of data, then what system is being worked?al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-60014016785714734782013-06-06T22:13:01.156-07:002013-06-06T22:13:01.156-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-12737428880610247212013-06-06T21:39:39.183-07:002013-06-06T21:39:39.183-07:00Questions/Notes:
1.) Every week, we are still wai...Questions/Notes:<br /><br />1.) Every week, we are still waiting for certain digital-only servicing all the way up till Friday afternoon for titles intended for review & adds on the following Monday/Friday. Sometimes things have even come in on Monday afternoon. Airplay monitoring can vary from station to station but reporting top adds on Fridays? Yeah, OK. Going through 40-50 titles per week to slot when titles are trickling in all week by Friday? It's important to note why you (the promoter) are only concerning yourself with a limited number of titles per week, the stations doing the work are compounded ten-fold. Look at Doug's list - pretty accurate from what I can remember from last week. So I take the quote, "It could be a busy day if stations actually took advantage of the start of reporting," and challenge you to do try this yourself on any given Friday. Reporting that's accurate, previewed, slotted, programmed, and notated for proper tracking even with sufficient staffs. <br /><br />2.) Doug's tracking of the charts throughout the four-day range is all predicated on frequency. Which is where the questions are posed: Where is rank equated? Doug's outline seems to simplify the process to occurrence, where Vampire Weekend charting at #1 at Station 'A' and charting at #30 at Station 'B' are equivalent values. Those same frequency numbers need to be added for the Phoenix, Deerhunter and Mikal Cronin titles because 'She & Him' was eclipsed by them all.<br /><br />3.) Statistics: I'm horrible at math, I mean bad. But here's a start: working off almost all nominal data - your independent variables (active titles in CMJ's system); your dependent variables (reporting stations). Throw out all the data and find a range from an issue (maybe not this one) where the outcome was very contentious. Then, you are dealing with frequency (easy) and rank using some simple values of interval data (scale). Again, someone who really knows stats can approach this in a number of ways but the results should be able to be replicated if the charts are derived from quantifiable mathematical values.<br />al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-12357970024165957172013-06-05T12:21:46.340-07:002013-06-05T12:21:46.340-07:00Great comments! Great comments! Douglashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11869222943805655924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-57919876805091883922013-05-22T22:44:08.743-07:002013-05-22T22:44:08.743-07:00So, what about stations that still can actually pr...So, what about stations that still can actually program radio? I'd like to think that would be the stations that report to CMJ.<br /><br />But what is the importance of an "add" when CMJ allows the title to be charted during the same week? How does 'Modern Vampires of The City' debut at #41 on Issue 1296 when said date of issue was 5/13/13 - which was it's actual ADD date? This sets up a whole system which is, at best, questionable to really what's being played and subsequently charted. It's a game to make sure that 'x-record' goes onto the chart, regardless of said title's true performance at any given reporting station.<br /><br />Bringing up 'The Lumineers' record is an excellent example of how the format can 'break' an artist, sending them on their way to a wider audience. That record's true performance was its chart life, not position. However, the argument being made is that these stations/MD's should be leaders and not followers when making programming decisions. The issue with that is that in the ever-devolving shelf-life of any given title, it's practically zero-sum from the get-go: Top Add week one - Top #30 week two - go #1 in week 3 (or four). The stations are pushed to work most titles fast and furious because next week the priorities are going to be completely different. So these MD's keep getting pushed in a million different directions on titles, not given time to explore records and champion them, and then be able to share that record with their DJ's that actually create interest that will grow and then reported back. This kind of natural progression of an record doesn't exist in a four-week vacuum. So, 'The Lumineers' (obviously) is exactly how new artists are broken on the format in the real-world.<br /><br />Take that metric and it can probably be easily said that Charles Bradley's 'Victim Of Love' LP is the most successful record to come out of college-radio in 2013 thusfar. That title still sits pretty high and it's still being charted because a good amount of stations actually like the record and still are discovering it. 'Victim Of Love' ceased to be pushed for chart impact some time ago. Same for 'Phosphorescent' and 'Thee Oh Sees' (a true surprise and well-deserved #1) as well. A shame, I'm sure those accounts are well-closed at this point (bragging rights do not pay the bills).<br /><br />So, what does it look like from here till July? If you are not the lucky person(s) working 'The National', 'Vampire Weekend', or 'Daft Punk' record, then it's probably a no-go. Only spoilers to that party might be the 'QOTSA' or 'Boards of Canada' but you are still looking into the holiday weekend. 'She & Him' and 'Deerhunter' are fighting for #2 next week if they are lucky to chart higher for one week over 'The National'. But really, when attempting to figure out if 'Vampire Weekend' or 'The National' record is going to be #1 for 1298, you really have to ask yourself if it really matters? <br /><br />Of course it's a quantity issue - but I'll leave that for another comment week when 'Random Access Memories' goes #1 and it's way more revealing who is sitting at the #5-#10 slots.al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-65830452382288876882013-05-22T22:43:06.754-07:002013-05-22T22:43:06.754-07:00Always interesting posts Mr. Blake. The fact that...Always interesting posts Mr. Blake. The fact that anyone is conducting a deeper analysis of the CMJ 200 Charts is appreciated.<br /><br />The 'Phoenix' record going #1 for another week was not terribly surprising given all the variables you touch upon in your article (station turnover, reduced contributors, etc..). It's the release primed with the largest name recognition, following a major crossover record for them and Coachella, mainstream press, etc.. It's not terribly surprising that stations not fully keeping current are just throwing that on the top because you know, why not? When the chart is so compromised to begin with, you'll get a ho-hum record like 'Bankrupt!' at #1 for two weeks on a chart that's desperately needs ADHD medication.<br /><br />Interesting there was some debate about the importance of adds in relation to congruent promotions/tours/appearances at Non-Comm but that only really happens in an ideal situation where one of the main aims of the format is to expose emerging artists or releases that otherwise would receive no radio airplay anywhere else. Sure, the main action is to rise up onto XPN level playlists (FMQB action) because pretty much all of this isn't going to go any further than that. There's probably an intern at Clear Channel and Cumulus that's into the new 'Phoenix' record - score. Everyone is fighting for the largest scraps in the dominated corporate radio paradigm of programming.<br />al0137https://www.blogger.com/profile/12064455977868524605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-84076126923504864632009-08-04T14:48:42.182-07:002009-08-04T14:48:42.182-07:00Good read...thanks. I may have to (gulp) stop by ...Good read...thanks. I may have to (gulp) stop by more often and read your stuff. <br /><br />Did you see Abbotts won 2009 Maxim Magazine for Best Lobster Roll in the US? If they only knew!!!<br /><br />Bill GlenneyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-59144982803196660742008-12-12T19:51:00.000-08:002008-12-12T19:51:00.000-08:00Come on Doug! City and Colour has to be higher th...Come on Doug! City and Colour has to be higher than that. It was definitely my favorite CD. Always reminds me of Colorado and wintertime. It's just lovely.<BR/><BR/>How's BK treating you?<BR/><BR/>JerricaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-74829018346949728032008-12-11T06:55:00.000-08:002008-12-11T06:55:00.000-08:00The red one is my favorite! You should try sellin...The red one is my favorite! You should try selling these on Etsy too.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11187542104847520320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-4358409292177105832008-12-08T21:25:00.000-08:002008-12-08T21:25:00.000-08:00hey! that's the wolf parade song im playing on my ...hey! that's the wolf parade song im playing on my show, different man man song though...nice working with you, see talk to you next year!Griffinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01016091784156348559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-12651094816729275062008-10-13T06:15:00.000-07:002008-10-13T06:15:00.000-07:00nice video, do you know what the show was or any m...nice video, do you know what the show was or any more details so that i could maybe find it in the archives on KEXPs website. ThanksStephen Bradleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14467356571429148735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-58066538228617496052008-07-12T08:12:00.000-07:002008-07-12T08:12:00.000-07:00Jackie Robinson's BallsJackie Robinson's BallsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-1486240283092689182008-06-17T08:43:00.000-07:002008-06-17T08:43:00.000-07:00I believe Braden was trying to hold up 12 or 13 fi...I believe Braden was trying to hold up 12 or 13 fingers there in that last photo, but needed to also hold his beer. I was trying to help with extra fingers.homesweethomewreckerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18033935651816024592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-36371306604109170812008-04-21T14:50:00.000-07:002008-04-21T14:50:00.000-07:00too much funtoo much funAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-64830648414162457992008-03-27T11:37:00.000-07:002008-03-27T11:37:00.000-07:00I'm not even as tall as his armpit.I'm not even as tall as his armpit.LoK xohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03957730082714275912noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-13862921670607076382008-03-14T21:30:00.000-07:002008-03-14T21:30:00.000-07:00You really need to take ESL classes.You really need to take ESL classes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-60438799263609975582008-03-14T21:29:00.000-07:002008-03-14T21:29:00.000-07:00You're so annoying I can't stand it.You're so annoying I can't stand it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-37575225900855631352008-03-10T09:42:00.000-07:002008-03-10T09:42:00.000-07:00Don't be dissin the simple life.You're just upset ...Don't be dissin the simple life.<BR/>You're just upset because you can't come eat crawfish.Rachelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13728157145127159195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10354554.post-59467038824797800032008-01-27T16:05:00.000-08:002008-01-27T16:05:00.000-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com